How is it that other groups have managed to get water onto the refuge without being fined? There is a process that allows for it, and NMD has chosen not to go through that process. Why? Is it possible that they wish to be fined and garner attention through this stunt? They have been told that if they will only 1: use large immovable containers to put out water as other groups have or 2: chain the bottles in one place so that they cannot be carried off, that they would be allowed to leave water.
It is unfortunate that the refuge has done a poor job of defending themselves in the press, but this failure in the media does not excuse writers for their poor research and bias.
And: of course people who have been fined and tresspassed from the refuge for breaking it's rules would be refused a request to do their community service there. They have shown that they have no respect for the mission of the Fish and Wildlife service, which is not immigration enforcement, but the protection of wildlife and habbitat.
Recent Comments
It is unfortunate that the refuge has done a poor job of defending themselves in the press, but this failure in the media does not excuse writers for their poor research and bias.
And: of course people who have been fined and tresspassed from the refuge for breaking it's rules would be refused a request to do their community service there. They have shown that they have no respect for the mission of the Fish and Wildlife service, which is not immigration enforcement, but the protection of wildlife and habbitat.