Jonathan Starrett 
Member since Jul 16, 2014



  • No friends yet.
Become My Friend Find friends »

Recent Comments

Re: “AZ's Election Day Disaster

markus_jim, I went to Pima County Recorder's office on Wed. and inquired about such a situation. The best thing to do is go downtown (240 N. Stone Avenue), turn right at the door to enter the Recorders office, and talk to any one of those Voter Registration Clerks there. Ask them to see the Images from all of your past Voter Registration cards. I did the same; saw Voter Registration history going back several years, every time I changed addresses. My guess is that there is a software bug or bad design in the MVD website, and based on my conversations with the Pima County Recorder, they blindly accept whatever data comes from the MVD website without a verification process.

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by Jonathan Starrett on 03/25/2016 at 11:18 AM

Re: “Sponsor Appeal

PRESS RELEASE: Dr. Sue Sisley Seeks New Study Location; UA Denies Appeal for Reinstatement

Posted by Jonathan Starrett on 07/30/2014 at 11:23 AM

Re: “Reefer Research Madness

Career Researcher.... when someone devotes 4 years of their life to get the necessary Federal agency approvals to perform the research, they own the study - plain and simple. MAPS stands behind Dr. Sisley, and has communicated their intentions to UofA.

I think that you would be better off debating the results of the study and identifying any bias in the resulting data, than to continue to advocate for Dr. Sisley's replacement.

You choose to hide behind the anonymity of the internet, as is your right. However, everyone reading your comments will begin to question your own intentions and bias. Do you wish for Dr. Sisley to be replaced by someone more aligned with your own beliefs?

11 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by Jonathan Starrett on 07/18/2014 at 10:46 AM

Re: “Reefer Research Madness

Career Researcher.... its called a hypothesis. The purpose of research and the scientific method is to test hypothesis put forth at the start of a study. I have confidence that an FDA-approved, triple-blind study would be more about collecting and interpreting data, not drawing conclusions that are not supported by that data.

In addition, wouldn't the study be peer reviewed so that it is not merely Dr. Sisley's conclusions, but a consensus of the scientific community?

15 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by Jonathan Starrett on 07/17/2014 at 12:19 PM

Favorite Places

  • None.
Find places »

Saved Events

  • Nada.
Find events »

Saved Stories

  • Nope.
Find stories »

Custom Lists

  • Zip.

© 2019 Tucson Weekly | 7225 Mona Lisa Rd. Ste. 125, Tucson AZ 85741 | (520) 797-4384 | Powered by Foundation