Member since Jul 2, 2009



  • No friends yet.
Become My Friend Find friends »

Recent Comments

Re: “Orgy of Excess

Dear Editor,

I am Maryanne Chisholm’s Mother. I was not allowed into the 2nd portion of her trial. There was substantial evidence from several sources to prove her innocence, but because of lack of organization and failure to review it, it was not presented at all. Mr.Diodati failed to depose or interview any witnesses for the defense.
Also, of the 58 charges against her there, 54 were individual shareholders approached only by Thuc Nguyen who forged fake shares of the Company, sold them to the 54 and pocketed the money himself. Maryanne never met or spoke with them. Neither Maryanne nor the Company knew anything about them until too late. In contrast to the 4 major seizures of Chisholm computers, papers and possessions, Thuc Nguyen’s were never seized nor were anyone else’s.
I was interested to read that Deputy Attorney John Evans says he doesn’t know how much the prosecution costs of the case were. Do they not keep records of those things? It seems a large sum of taxpayer money not to know about. Maryanne and her lawyer believe that the Case Map the State was charged for, by Mr, Diodati and the Paralegal , most probably doesn’t exist. No-one has seen it. Is this a fraud by someone on the Defence side?
There seem to be a great number of unanswered questions in this case. If I had not lived through it, I would not have believed American Justice could be conducted this way. Jane Allen


1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by JaneAD on 07/02/2009 at 8:43 AM

Favorite Places

  • None.
Find places »

Saved Events

  • Nada.
Find events »

Saved Stories

  • Nope.
Find stories »

Custom Lists

  • Zip.

© 2018 Tucson Weekly | 7225 Mona Lisa Rd. Ste. 125, Tucson AZ 85741 | (520) 797-4384 | Powered by Foundation