Member since Mar 16, 2010

Contributions:

  • Posted by:
    CPT on 03/16/2010 at 2:57 PM
    Very interesting that Congressman Hayworth would say such a thing. You see, if we substitute the word "horse" with "slave," and the word, “same-sex” with “mixed-race,” there is a startling equation to the thinking that once sanctioned slavery. To paraphrase the Congressman, “You see, the Massachusetts Supreme Court, when it started this move toward mixed-race (same-sex) marriage, actually defined marriage -- now get this -- it defined marriage as simply, 'the establishment of intimacy,'" Hayworth said. "Now how dangerous is that? I mean, I don't mean to be absurd about it, but I guess I can make the point of absurdity with an absurd point — I guess that would mean if you really had affection for your slave (horse – actually very apt since, at one point, both were considered property), I guess you could marry your slave (horse). It's just the wrong way to go, and the only way to protect the institution of marriage is with that federal marriage amendment that I support."