¡Ask a Mexican!

Dear Mexican: When World War II ended, the Germans and the Japanese had to return all of territories they had acquired by force. The U.S. acquired most of the West by force from Mexico, due to the war with Mexico. It's generally agreed that the U.S. won the war, but does that make it right?

I do not think so, so why doesn't Mexico go to the World Court and sue? I know the United States wouldn't acquiesce if it were to lose, but at least the taking of Mexican territory would be branded an illegal act.

I know that to some, this will sound un-American, but I think it is totally American—it's called righting a wrong. I was born in Alabama, a state that knows a lot about being un-American (remember the Civil War?), and I was raised in Virginia—another state that knows a lot about being un-American (again, the Civil War)—as well as Washington, D.C., whose citizens have less rights than other Americans. My heritage is English-Irish, so the only ax I have to grind is to see to it that my country commits as few wrongs as possible.

Bob

Dear Beto: I like your thinking! Alas, it wouldn't fly—although the Mexican-American War was a blatant imperial land grab, the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo was an official document that ended the war. It was signed under duress, yes, but it is nevertheless relatively ironclad.

Besides, the United States considers the International Court of Justice a clown court (as you correctly note) whose issued opinions mean mierda if they go against the Stars and Stripes—see 1984's Nicaragua vs. United States, where the court correctly ruled that the United States illegally supported the Contras, only to have Ronald Reagan consider the decision as meaningful as striking air-traffic controllers.

Finally, why bother with legal systems when demographic reality is doing it for us? Didja hear that former U.S. Census Director Steve Murdoch recently studied the population trends of Texas and told the state's House of Representatives' Mexican American Legislative Caucus, "Basically, it's over for Anglos in Texas"? That's the future, folks: the end of the gabacho race, and the Mexican says it's a good thing—not so much for Reconquista purposes, but because it means more intermarriage will happen and perhaps finish our racialist games once and for all. Because nothing stops racism like a hot mamacita or a cute, fecund gabacha.


I have a few online gal pals. The ones who are Mexicans have an affinity for composing mail in ALL CAPS. It doesn't particularly annoy me; I just wondered if there is a cultural significance behind this larger-than-life correspondence style.

Curioso Amarillo

Dear Curious Yellow: Because they are LOUD. The funny thing is that the Spanish language generally capitalizes words less than English, so we can't blame the all-caps on their Mexi side, for once, nor can we blame it on the fact that sOmE wRiTe lIkEa tHiS.


GOOD MEXICAN OF THE WEEK!

Most of you know about Lalo Alcaraz, the nationally syndicated cartoonist behind the comic strip La Cucaracha (and if you don't know him, think of Alcaraz as Garry Trudeau meets Aaron McGruder meets the end of a tequila bottle). But this plug is for his Twitter account, one of the better stream-of-consciousness experiments out there. Better yet? Unlike other funnymen, Alcaraz responds to EVERYTHING—especially nasty remarks, and this makes him even more chistoso. Follow him at twitter.com/laloalcaraz, or find him online at pocho.com


Ask the Mexican at themexican@askamexican.net; be his fan on Facebook; follow him on Twitter; or ask him a video question at youtube.com/askamexicano!