Grijalva Supporter
I will have to disagree again. I did not say you had to have your I.D. with you. (even though that may be the law for driving). I said " should be carried " Every time I have traveled to another country I was smart enough to carry ALL the nessary I.D. required in that country and never complained about showing it to anyone including an undercover officer in Singapore. And I know I could find statics that suppory MY Thoughts, but I will not. There is a lot More to citizenship then just taxes. I served in the Navy for 6 years, I have also served on jury Duty many Times, And I give to my comminity not just take. I have traveled for many years to just north of the Mexico border (hunting legaly)and have seen for myself that things may be improving, But a reduced flood is still a flood no matter which way you look at it. If Grijalva wanted to make thing better for US THE TAXPAYERS, he would look at ways to help both the native born and non native to correct the problems we have. My grandfather built my house (on the south side) during WWII and yet I have had Racial slurs directed at me because I am White and "I don't belong here" according to them (LaRaza schooled teenager). I want to fix the problems not PANDER TO THE VOTE.
Grijalva Supporter
You are sooo wrong. As a native of Arizona I have seen things go to hell in a hand basket. I supported the amnisty that Clinton passed becouse all of us were under the impression that we could get a handle on that problem. However things have gone "south" and out of control. Asking for your legal status should be part of a law officers duty, All forms of I.D. should be carried AT ALL TIMES. Law officers would not pull you over just becouse they want to check your status, only when you break a law. If this law is overturned this will not be the end of it. All fair minded people will not let Law breakers continue to get all of the benifits of citizenship with out paying the cost.
Recent Comments
I will have to disagree again. I did not say you had to have your I.D. with you. (even though that may be the law for driving). I said " should be carried " Every time I have traveled to another country I was smart enough to carry ALL the nessary I.D. required in that country and never complained about showing it to anyone including an undercover officer in Singapore. And I know I could find statics that suppory MY Thoughts, but I will not. There is a lot More to citizenship then just taxes. I served in the Navy for 6 years, I have also served on jury Duty many Times, And I give to my comminity not just take. I have traveled for many years to just north of the Mexico border (hunting legaly)and have seen for myself that things may be improving, But a reduced flood is still a flood no matter which way you look at it. If Grijalva wanted to make thing better for US THE TAXPAYERS, he would look at ways to help both the native born and non native to correct the problems we have. My grandfather built my house (on the south side) during WWII and yet I have had Racial slurs directed at me because I am White and "I don't belong here" according to them (LaRaza schooled teenager). I want to fix the problems not PANDER TO THE VOTE.
You are sooo wrong. As a native of Arizona I have seen things go to hell in a hand basket. I supported the amnisty that Clinton passed becouse all of us were under the impression that we could get a handle on that problem. However things have gone "south" and out of control. Asking for your legal status should be part of a law officers duty, All forms of I.D. should be carried AT ALL TIMES. Law officers would not pull you over just becouse they want to check your status, only when you break a law. If this law is overturned this will not be the end of it. All fair minded people will not let Law breakers continue to get all of the benifits of citizenship with out paying the cost.